Hi there,
Sorry I've been away. My day currently consists of getting up really
early, going to work/college/studios/wherever, then followed
immediately by going to work/college/studios/wherever, after which I
go to work/college/studios/wherever, followed by
work/college/studios/wherever. After I finish at 2:00am, I come home
and wank furiously into a picture of Gordon Brown's face, listening to
the Wurzel's "I've Got a Brand New Combine Harvester" on repeat and
crying. That makes my day complete. So it's fair to say, I didn't get
a good chance to update this thing here.
So, this is a bit of a rant about newspapers. Yes. Newspapers. Staring
at you everywhere with a moral high ground on everything. They're
better than you, because they report everything really quickly and
they have their names on papers and get paid for it and you are just a
nobody with nothing doing fuck all and reading about it. HAR. Yes. The
apper that supposedly speaks for the common man would be something
like the Sun or the Mirror, whose own political agendas change so much
you're never quite sure whether they're right wing or left wing from
one page to another. The Guardian is my preferred choice but that
would be the case for a "liberal lefty" like me, right? I suppose I'm
one of those people who thinks that all asylum seekers should be
allowed in and Islam should be the number one religion in the UK,
right? RIGHT?
Well no. I just like the Guardian because it has slightly better
supplementary material. And Charlie Brooker writes for them.
Truth be told, I don't usually give a shit about the news because it's
written and presented by cunts. Every single one of them. They never
portray themselves as such though, which is the basis of this whole
rant. A few days ago, I went out drinking with someone who bought a
journalist from a certain right wing paper with him. Now, I
systematically was born to hate the certain right wing paper with a
passion. It's gutter press at it's worst. Anyway, a few drinks with
this bloke and he started ratting off about how many drugs and drink
he's done. Chain smoking and drinking shitloads also seemed to be on
the menu. Now, personally, I don't give a shit whether you do drugs or
not. (All drugs should be legalised and taxed anyway. Then you get rid
of the crime subculture associated with it and the drug lords and
underground warlords would also disappear. But then the police
wouldn't have much to do. The whole narcotics wing would
disappear..... it's almost like the police WANT the illegality to stay
so they're in busines.... I'd better shut up now.) but the realisation
that this foul specimen would then go back to the papers and talk
about people who do drugs in a negative light really appalled me.
The other thing it got me thinking about is the whole Tiger Woods,
John Terry and, to a completely lesser extent, Vernon Kay. You see,
most of the public, when asked about what they thought of these
people's private lives in vox pops, didn't give a shit. Lots of people
said "If it doesn't effect his performance, I don't care". So why the
fuck does personal lives of sportsmen, which, by the way, is a REALLY
FUCKING STUPID THING TO WRITE ABOUT IN THE FIRST PLACE matter to the
higher ups? Why did Tiger's face fall of Gatorate when it was found
out he'd fucked more women than Ron Jeremy and Ben Dover combined?
(Now there's a sexy image). Why did John Terry get fired? It has
nothing to do with their sporting prowess in the first place. That
said, it was worth seeing Vernon snivelling around and apologising to
his airhead lady about sending texts to... ANOTHER airhead lady. But
that's only because he's a twat in the first place.
In some weird way, the papers are painting this bizarre moral
scripture to which a lot of the sheep in the UK happily subscribe to.
In a way, I'm glad about it. The overall message of "cheating on your
wife is a bad thing and YOU WILL LOSE YOUR JOB/Sponsorship (if
applicable)" is, in fact, no bad thing. You see, the formula for
making people care is making sure the person in question is a TV or
sports star. Then you can get them out of a job. If Gordon Brown was a
golfer as well as being PM, a few lines about how he's been shagging
behind Sarah's back (actually, behind someones back is technically in
front of them, isn't it?) and he'd be forced to resign.
Of course, as a disclaimer, I would just like to say that at no point
in the UK's history has a journalist EVER, and I repeat EVER:
1) Had an alcoholic beverage to the point of excess, so much so to be
called an alcoholic.
2) Smoked a cigarette.
3) Hit anyone.
4) Not paid tax or a TV License.
5) Smoked a "jazz cigarette"
6) Taken ANY sort of drugs.
7) Downloaded or shared music.
8) Downloaded or shared a film.
9) Had sex before marriage.
10) Participated in any sexual behaviour other than marrying a good
Christian woman and having sex once for the purposes of conceiving a
child.
11) Hired a prostitute.
12) Downloaded mindbendingly degrading hardcore belgian pornography.
13) Been a racist.
14) Been a sexist.
15) Gone over 30 in a 30 mph zone.
I could go on, but the saintly face of Quentin Letts staring from a
copy of the Daily Mail used as a liner for a carton of kebab meat and
chips is just so bright, I need to spunk on his face RIGHT NOW.